Segment
2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (66%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Line and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line has A wet grip rating, whereas 49% of Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Line is made in Finland and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is made in Germany.
| # | Nokian Line
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Highly recommended2. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet handling
2. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian Line 72%
Wet braking
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
2. Nokian Line 83%
Dry braking
2. Nokian Line 80%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
2. Nokian Line 78%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian Line 72%
