Segment
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Nokian (66%). The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2021 when was the Fulda EcoControl HP2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line has A wet grip rating, whereas 96% of Fulda EcoControl HP2 has B rating. We also know where Line is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian Line
| Fulda EcoControl HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Line 12.172. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet handling
1. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian Line 72%
Wet braking
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian Line 83%
Dry braking
1. Nokian Line 80%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Rolling resistance
1. Nokian Line 78%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian Line 72%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
