Segment
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Falken Azenis FK510
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (66%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Line is made in Finland and Azenis FK510 is made in Japan/Turkey.
| # | Nokian Line
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
2. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking
2. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian Line 83%
Dry steering response
1. Nokian Line 60%
Dry driving behavior
1. Nokian Line 74%
Dry lane changing
1. Nokian Line 85%
Dry braking
1. Nokian Line 80%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Rolling resistance
1. Nokian Line 78%
Price/value
2. Nokian Line 30%
Fuel efficiency
2. Nokian Line 78%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian Line 72%
Comfort
2. Nokian Line 60%
Interior noise
2. Nokian Line 66%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
