Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (66%). The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (85%) of the Continental PremiumContact 6 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Line is made in Finland and PremiumContact 6 is made in Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic.
| # | Nokian Line
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
2. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking
2. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
2. Nokian Line 83%
Dry steering response
2. Nokian Line 60%
Dry driving behavior
2. Nokian Line 74%
Dry lane changing
2. Nokian Line 85%
Dry braking
2. Nokian Line 80%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Rolling resistance
1. Nokian Line 78%
Price/value
2. Nokian Line 30%
Fuel efficiency
2. Nokian Line 78%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian Line 72%
Comfort
2. Nokian Line 60%
Interior noise
2. Nokian Line 66%
