Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (66%). The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Continental PremiumContact 6 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Line is made in Finland and PremiumContact 6 is made in Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic.
# | Nokian Line
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
2. Nokian Line 17.
2. Nokian Line 12.17
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Nokian Line Good
1. Nokian Line Good2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
1. Nokian Line 72%
1. Nokian Line 84%
2. Nokian Line 80%
2. Nokian Line 84%
2. Nokian Line 87%
2. Nokian Line 83%
2. Nokian Line 85%
2. Nokian Line 80%
2. Nokian Line 60%
2. Nokian Line 74%
1. Nokian Line 78%
2. Nokian Line 63%
2. Nokian Line 30%
2. Nokian Line 78%
1. Nokian Line 72%
2. Nokian Line 66%
2. Nokian Line 60%