Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 5 Premium2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Continental PremiumContact 5
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (66%). The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Continental PremiumContact 5 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (70%) of the Continental PremiumContact 5 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Line is made in Finland and PremiumContact 5 is made in Czech Republic.
| # | Nokian Line
| Continental PremiumContact 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Continental PremiumContact 5 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Continental PremiumContact 5 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
1. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian Line 83%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian Line 78%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian Line 72%
