Segment
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Barum (39%). The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Barum Bravuris 5 HM first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Barum Bravuris 5 HM has B rating. We also know where Line is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian Line
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Line 12.172. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
1. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian Line 83%
Dry braking
1. Nokian Line 80%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Rolling resistance
2. Nokian Line 78%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian Line 72%
