Segment
1. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Yokohama (42%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Line SUV and Yokohama Bluearth AE-50, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Line SUV and the Bluearth AE-50 were tested.
| # | Nokian Line SUV
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | velmi dobré | 100 | 100 | 109 | ||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 96,8 | dobrý | 97,2 | 96,4 | 86,5 | ||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Rating: Weak | 95,6 | slabý | 93,6 | 97,5 | 97,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
