Segment
1. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Vredestein Sportrac 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Vredestein (55%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Sportrac 5 has a better rating of 58% compared to 46% of the Nokian Line SUV. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Line SUV and the Sportrac 5 were tested.
| # | Nokian Line SUV | Vredestein Sportrac 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian Line SUV Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Nokian Line SUV ? dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 153 | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | ||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Recommended | 141 | 61 | 44 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 137 | 54 | 47 | 16 | 6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||