Segment
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nokian (66%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Line SUV and Michelin Latitude Tour HP, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian Line SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Michelin Latitude Tour HP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Line SUV and the Latitude Tour HP were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Nokian Line SUV has A wet grip rating, whereas 69% of Michelin Latitude Tour HP has C rating.
# | Nokian Line SUV
| Michelin Latitude Tour HP
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Sufficient
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 153 | velmi doporučeno | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | |
Nokian Line SUV Rating: Recommended | 141 | doporučeno | 61 | 44 | 14 | 7 | |
Michelin Latitude Tour HP Rating: Conditionally recommended | 124 | podmíněně doporučeno | 53 | 37 | 15 | 8 | |
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | chvalitebné | 2,0 | 1,6 | 0,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | |
Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | dobré | 2,6 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,8 | |
Michelin Latitude Tour HP Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,9 | 2,3 | 0,5 | 3,1 | 1,9 | |
Show test details |