Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Nokian (66%). Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Line SUV and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Nokian Line SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 also have A wet ratings.
# | Nokian Line SUV
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Nokian Line SUV Good
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 153 | velmi doporučeno | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | |
Nokian Line SUV Rating: Recommended | 141 | doporučeno | 61 | 44 | 14 | 7 | |
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Recommended | 144 | doporučeno | 57 | 47 | 16 | 9 | |
Show test details |