Segment
2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (66%). Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Line SUV and the Efficient Grip Performance were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Nokian Line SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (50%) of the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Line SUV
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Exemplary2. Nokian Line SUV Good
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Line SUV Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | velmi dobré | 100 | 100 | 109 | ||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 96,8 | dobrý | 97,2 | 96,4 | 86,5 | ||
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Rating: Very good | 98,7 | velmi dobré | 98,7 | 98,7 | 109 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
