Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Nokian Hakka Blue 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Hakka Blue 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nokian (66%). The first tyre test of Nokian Hakka Blue 2 was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin Primacy 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Teknikens 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Hakka Blue 2 and the Primacy 4 were tested.
| # | Nokian Hakka Blue 2
| Michelin Primacy 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Nokian Hakka Blue 2 | 59 | 25 | 18 | 8 | 8 | ||
| Michelin Primacy 4 | 61 | 24 | 17 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
