Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Nokian Hakka Blue 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Hakka Blue 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (66%). The first tyre test of Nokian Hakka Blue 2 was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Teknikens 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Hakka Blue 2 and the PremiumContact 6 were tested.
| # | Nokian Hakka Blue 2
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Nokian Hakka Blue 2 | 59 | 25 | 18 | 8 | 8 | ||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 57 | 24 | 17 | 6 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
