Segment
1. Nokian cLine VAN Upper-middle2. Falken Linam VAN01 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian cLine VAN vs. Falken Linam VAN01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (66%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian cLine VAN and Falken Linam VAN01, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the cLine VAN and the Linam VAN01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian cLine VAN dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (96%) of the Falken Linam VAN01 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian cLine VAN
| Falken Linam VAN01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Linam VAN01 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Nokian cLine VAN Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
| Falken Linam VAN01 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 4,6 | 2,8 | 3,2 | 0,5 | 2,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
