Segment
1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV Lowcost2. Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar). Generally, Nexen winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Tristar (1%). But when it comes to comparing Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV and Tristar Ice-Plus S210, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Tristar Ice-Plus S210 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 215/60 R17 test, where both the WinGuard Sport 2 SUV and the Ice-Plus S210 were tested.
# | Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV
| Tristar Ice-Plus S210
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R15 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV Lowcost2. Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2 | 1 | |||
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 3 | 3+ | 1- | |||
Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 4+ | 2 | 3- | |||
Show test details |