Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nexen (57%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 215/60 R17 test, where both the WinGuard Sport 2 SUV and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested.
| # | Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2 | 1 | |||
| Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 3 | 3+ | 1- | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2 | 1 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
