Segment
1. Nokian cLine VAN Upper-middle2. Nexen ROADIAN CT8 Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen ROADIAN CT8 vs. Nokian cLine VAN
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Nexen (61%). But when it comes to comparing Nexen ROADIAN CT8 and Nokian cLine VAN, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the ROADIAN CT8 and the cLine VAN were tested.
| # | Nexen ROADIAN CT8
| Nokian cLine VAN
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R0 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Nexen ROADIAN CT8 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,0 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 1,7 | |
| Nokian cLine VAN Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
