Segment
1. Nexen ROADIAN CT8 Lowcost2. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen ROADIAN CT8 vs. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis). Generally, Maxxis summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Nexen (61%). But when it comes to comparing Nexen ROADIAN CT8 and Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the ROADIAN CT8 and the Vansmart MCV3+ were tested.
| # | Nexen ROADIAN CT8
| Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Nexen ROADIAN CT8 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,0 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 1,7 | |
| Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,7 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,3 | |
| Show test details | |||||||