Segment
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle2. Nexen ROADIAN CT8 Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen ROADIAN CT8 vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Kumho (60%). But when it comes to comparing Nexen ROADIAN CT8 and Kumho PorTran KC53, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the ROADIAN CT8 and the PorTran KC53 were tested.
| # | Nexen ROADIAN CT8
| Kumho PorTran KC53
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Nexen ROADIAN CT8 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,0 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 1,7 | |
| Kumho PorTran KC53 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,8 | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||