Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N fera Sport vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
| # | Nexen N fera Sport
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
If you're deciding between two tyres, the Nexen N'fera Sport and the Kumho Ecsta PS71 are certainly worth considering. Both are summer tyres and have been tested extensively in various conditions. We have compiled data from multiple tests to make your decision easier.
The Nexen N'fera Sport has an overall rating of 76% and prides itself as the first equipment for BMW 2-series Active Tourer. Manufactured in CZ, it particularly excels in terms of exterior noise, as shown in the tests conducted by ACE. In Autobild's tests featuring 50 tyres, the Nexen N'fera Sport managed to secure the 7th position, underlining its strength in areas like aquaplaning, longitudal, and wet braking. However, it fell slightly behind in the ADAC tests, with mileage noted as its best feature. Despite this, its dry road performance garnered positive remarks, while the weaknesses pointed out included increased wear and somewhat higher fuel consumption. You can find out more about this tyre here. To learn about the manufacturer, visit Nexen.'s website.
On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 received a marginally higher rating of 77%. This tyre outperformed in the ACE test by gaining the 7th position out of 10 with its best feature being the longitudinal aquaplaning. Even better, it secured the 5th position in the Autobild tests. According to the summary from the ace 2023 tests, it showcases a balanced high-performance potential, good handling qualities, and short wet and dry braking distances. Though it has a slight issue with increased drive noise. The ADAC tests placed this model at the 10th position out of 16, with outstanding performance in cross and longitudinal aquaplaning. Review the details of this tyre here or visit the manufacturer, Kumho's website for more information.
In conclusion, both tyres possess specific strengths and weaknesses. It ultimately boils down to your personal preference. The Nexen N'fera Sport seems to hold an edge in noise reduction and dry performance but has increased wear and fuel consumption, while the Kumho Ecsta PS71 boasts superior performance in aquaplaning and handling but suffers from slightly increased noise. Both options are certainly worthy of consideration as they each serve specific needs.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 35.0 | 30.9 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | 71 | 54 | 19 | 7 | ||
| Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 61 | 48 | 17 | 7 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 67 | 47 | 18 | 3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vynikající | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Nexen N Fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 3+ | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 63.2 | 27.2 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 61.7 | 26.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | ||
| Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 1,9 | 2,8 | 2,5 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 1 | |||
| Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 1- | 2- | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 1 | 2 | 3- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Nexen N fera Sport | 33,2 | 30,9 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
| Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,2 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | |
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,3 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
