Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV vs. Michelin Primacy 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nexen (61%). The first tyre test of Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin Primacy 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 235/55 R18 test, where both the N FERA SPORT SUV and the Primacy 4 were tested.
| # | Nexen N FERA SPORT SUV
| Michelin Primacy 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Sand traction
Handling on gravel
Grass traction
Gravel traction
Mud traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Offroad | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Nexen N fera Sport SUV Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2 | 2- | |||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Good | dobré | 1- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
