Segment
1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle2. Nexen N blue HD plus Lowcost
# | Nexen N blue HD plus
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we're comparing two summer tyres, the Nexen N blue HD plus and the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50. Both of these models are highly regarded by users and have been put through their paces in a number of tests. Let's see how they stack up against each other.
The Nexen N blue HD plus, manufactured in Korea, is a popular choice for many drivers. In our tests, it achieved a rating of 42%. Although this tyre has not been replaced by a newer model, its performance remains consistent and reliable. It earned 12th place in the Autobild test out of 50 tyres and an impressive 8th place in the Autoklub ČR test out of 9 tyres. For more information about the Nexen N blue HD plus, visit the Nexen website.
The Yokohama Bluearth AE-50, on the other hand, did not earn a rating in our tests. Despite this, it managed respectable positions in the Autobild and Autoklub ČR tests, coming in 13th out of 50 and 7th out of 9 respectively. This tyre has not yet been replaced by a newer model, so its strong performance still stands. If you're interested in knowing more about this tyre, you can visit the Yokohama website.
Verdict: Both tyres have demonstrated strong performances across multiple tests. The Nexen N blue HD plus has a slightly better overall rating and performed slightly better in the Autobild tests. However, the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 took a higher position in the Autoklub ČR test. Depending upon your specific needs and driving conditions, both tyres could serve you well. Therefore, the best tyre for you would ultimately depend on your specific requirements and personal preference.
Strengths and Weaknesses: While we do not have a detailed analysis on the strengths and weaknesses of each tyre, we can safely say that both have shown solid all-round performances. The Nexen N blue HD plus's strengths lie in its good testing outcomes and our rating percentage suggests it offers reliable, consistent performance. The Yokohama Bluearth AE-50, despite not having a rating in our tests, showed strong performances in other tests, indicating that it is a competent contender in the market.
To conclude, these two summer tyres present good options for drivers. They have demonstrated dependable performances in tests and have earned their positions in the market. As always, we would recommend that you consider your driving habits, conditions, and personal preferences when choosing the right tyre for you.
1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle2. Nexen N blue HD plus Lowcost
1. Nexen N blue HD plus Satisfactory
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
Nexen N blue HD plus | 38,3 | 40,6 | |||||
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 37,7 | 40,2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 100 | velmi dobré | 100 | 100 | 109 | ||
Nexen N blue HD plus Rating: Weak | 95,4 | slabý | 93,7 | 97 | 92,1 | ||
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Rating: Weak | 95,6 | slabý | 93,6 | 97,5 | 97,2 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
Nexen N blue HD plus Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | 2 | |||
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | 1 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
Nexen N blue HD plus | 35,7 | 31,1 | |||||
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 36,4 | 30,5 | |||||
Show test details |