Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 Lowcost
Comparison: Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 vs. Nokian WR SUV 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Nankang (27%). The first tyre test of Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Offroad 2020 255/55 R19 test, where both the Winter Activa SV-55 and the WR SUV 4 were tested.
| # | Nankang Winter Activa SV-55
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 Sufficient
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Nankang Winter Activa SV-55 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečný | 3 | 3+ | 5+ | 4- | ||
| Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 2- | 1- | 1- | 1- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
