Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nankang Winter Activa SV-2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nankang (27%). The first tyre test of Nankang Winter Activa SV-2 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 225/45 R18 test, where both the Winter Activa SV-2 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested.
| # | Nankang Winter Activa SV-2
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Nankang Winter Activa SV-2 Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 4 | 2 | 3 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
