Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Nankang (41%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport has a better rating of 89% compared to 20% of the Nankang Sportnex AS-2+. The first tyre test of Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ was done in 2016, compared to 2021 when was the Bridgestone Potenza Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 255/35 R19 test, where both the Sportnex AS-2+ and the Potenza Sport were tested.
# | Nankang Sportnex AS-2+
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient
2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,1 | velmi dobré | 5,7 | 5,7 | 6,3 | ||
Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Rating: Sufficient | 5,7 | dostatečné | 7,6 | 5,7 | 8,6 | ||
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Very good | 9 | velmi dobré | 8,9 | 9,6 | 6,3 | ||
Show test details |