Segment
1. Nankang NK Snow SV-2 Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Lowcost
Comparison: Nankang NK Snow SV-2 vs. Barum Polaris 3 4x4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Nankang (27%). But when it comes to comparing Nankang NK Snow SV-2 and Barum Polaris 3 4x4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nankang NK Snow SV-2 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Barum Polaris 3 4x4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the NK Snow SV-2 and the Polaris 3 4x4 were tested.
| # | Nankang NK Snow SV-2
| Barum Polaris 3 4x4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| Nankang NK Snow SV-2 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,5 | 2,5 | 5,1 | 2,7 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
| Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,8 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
