Segment
1. Nankang NK Snow SV-2 Lowcost2. Apollo Apterra Winter Lowcost
Comparison: Nankang NK Snow SV-2 vs. Apollo Apterra Winter
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Nankang (27%). But when it comes to comparing Nankang NK Snow SV-2 and Apollo Apterra Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nankang NK Snow SV-2 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Apollo Apterra Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the NK Snow SV-2 and the Apterra Winter were tested.
| # | Nankang NK Snow SV-2
| Apollo Apterra Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Apterra Winter Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Apterra Winter Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| Nankang NK Snow SV-2 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,5 | 2,5 | 5,1 | 2,7 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
| Apollo Apterra Winter Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 2,0 | 2,7 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
