Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Premium2. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4S vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Vredestein (55%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 265/35 R19 test, where both the Pilot Sport 4S and the Ultrac Pro were tested.
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R23 | R18 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
