Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4S vs. Falken Azenis FK510
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Falken (70%). The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Sport 4S was done in 2024, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 57% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4S has B wet grip rating, whereas 69% of Falken Azenis FK510 has A rating.
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R23 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Dry steering response
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
