Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 4
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today's tyre comparison deals with two popular models - the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and the Kumho Ecsta PS71. Both are summer tyres, designed for superior performance on dry and wet roads alike.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 is a part of the prestigious Michelin line-up and is known for it's exceptional aquaplaning resistance and impressive dry braking capabilities. This tyre, rated at 88% by our team, has performed remarkably well in a multitude of tests and ranks consistently at the higher end of the spectrum. In fact, it has secured the 2nd position out of 53 tyres in the Autobild test with its best features being Aquaplaning - longitudinal, Dry braking, and Wet handling. The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 also secured the 2nd position in the ADAC test, showing its superior dry braking and mileage. Made in Spain and Germany, it is indeed a worthy successor to the Michelin Pilot Sport 3. However, do note that this model has been replaced by the newer Michelin Pilot Sport 5.
Next up is the Kumho Ecsta PS71 - a summer tyre from the house of Kumho that holds its ground with a solid performance and commendable aquaplaning features. Although it lags somewhat behind the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 in terms of overall ratings, it still holds a respectable 77% rating from our experts. In the Autobild test, it stands at the 18th position out of 53 tyres with striking features such as Aquaplaning - longitudinal and cross. Further, in the ADAC test, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 holds the 10th position, reinforcing its proficiency in Aquaplaning - cross and longitudinal aspects. Despite these achievements, it is important to mention that this model didn't evolve from any previous ones and there's currently no newer model to replace it.
In conclusion, if high aquaplaning resistance and dry braking capabilities are what you seek, Michelin Pilot Sport 4 is an obvious choice. However, for those who prioritize aquaplaning features and value a more budget-friendly option, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has got you covered.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 1 | |||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 1- | 2- | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 1 | 2 | 3- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | 32,1 | 29,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 1,9 | |
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,3 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1 | 1 | 1- | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2- | 3- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | 34,2 | 29,6 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 37,1 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
