Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has a better rating of 86% compared to 68% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 245/30 R20 test, where both the Pilot Sport 4 S and the Ecsta PS71 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 68% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Pilot Sport 4 S is made - United States.
# | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R18 - R23 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | ||||
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | ||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3 | 2- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | vítěz testu | 1 | |||||
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: - | Velmi doporučeno | 1 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 1 | ||||||
Show test details |