Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Premium2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 has a better rating of 59% compared to 50% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P has B rating.
| # | Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 | Nokian WR Snowproof P | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Exemplary2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory2. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB