Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 and Kumho WinterCraft WP71, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the Pilot Alpin PA4 and the WinterCraft WP71 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 also have C wet ratings.
# | Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R16 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Exemplary2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory | 3- | 2- | 1- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,2 | 9,9 | 10 | |||
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Rating: Recommended | 7,7 | 8,1 | 8,4 | 7,2 | |||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Still recommended | 7,1 | 7,8 | 7,8 | 6,5 | |||
Show test details |