Segment
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Toyo (60%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin Latitude Tour HP and Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Michelin Latitude Tour HP was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Latitude Tour HP and the Proxes CF2 SUV were tested.
# | Michelin Latitude Tour HP
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R15 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Conditionally recommended
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Sufficient
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 153 | velmi doporučeno | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | |
Michelin Latitude Tour HP Rating: Conditionally recommended | 124 | podmíněně doporučeno | 53 | 37 | 15 | 8 | |
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Conditionally recommended | 127 | podmíněně doporučeno | 42 | 44 | 17 | 9 | |
Show test details |