Segment
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nokian (66%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin Latitude Tour HP and Nokian Line SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Michelin Latitude Tour HP was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Line SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Latitude Tour HP and the Line SUV were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 69% of Michelin Latitude Tour HP has C wet grip rating, whereas 63% of Nokian Line SUV has A rating.
# | Michelin Latitude Tour HP
| Nokian Line SUV
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R15 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Sufficient
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 153 | velmi doporučeno | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | |
Michelin Latitude Tour HP Rating: Conditionally recommended | 124 | podmíněně doporučeno | 53 | 37 | 15 | 8 | |
Nokian Line SUV Rating: Recommended | 141 | doporučeno | 61 | 44 | 14 | 7 | |
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | chvalitebné | 2,0 | 1,6 | 0,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | |
Michelin Latitude Tour HP Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,9 | 2,3 | 0,5 | 3,1 | 1,9 | |
Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | dobré | 2,6 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,8 | |
Show test details |