Segment
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Cooper). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Cooper (38%). Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Latitude Tour HP and the Zeon 4XS Sport were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 69% of Michelin Latitude Tour HP has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport has A rating.
# | Michelin Latitude Tour HP
| Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Upper-middle
2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Conditionally recommended
1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Conditionally recommended2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Sufficient
1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69 dB
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 153 | velmi doporučeno | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | |
Michelin Latitude Tour HP Rating: Conditionally recommended | 124 | podmíněně doporučeno | 53 | 37 | 15 | 8 | |
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Rating: Recommended | 132 | doporučeno | 47 | 48 | 14 | 8 | |
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | chvalitebné | 2,0 | 1,6 | 0,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | |
Michelin Latitude Tour HP Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,9 | 2,3 | 0,5 | 3,1 | 1,9 | |
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,5 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,3 | |
Show test details |