Segment
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Nokian (52%). The first tyre test of Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Latitude Alpin LA2 and the WR SUV 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Nokian WR SUV 4 also have C wet ratings.
# | Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Test winner2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | |||
Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | |||
Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2- | 1 | |||
Show test details |