Segment
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nokian (66%). In this particular case, the Nokian WetProof has a better rating of 74% compared to 46% of the Michelin e.Primacy. The first tyre test of Michelin e.Primacy was done in 2023, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the e.Primacy and the WetProof were tested. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the e.Primacy is made in Italy/Spain and WetProof is made in Finland.
# | Michelin e.Primacy
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended2. Michelin e.Primacy Very good
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 1,3 | 3,9 | ||||
Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good | dobré | 2,9 | 2,0 | ||||
Show test details |