Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Michelin (83%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 94% compared to 93% of the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the CrossClimate 2 SUV and the Kinergy 4S2 X H750A were tested.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R18 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Test winner
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | ||||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Test winner | vítěz testu | ||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||