Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium2. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Falken (65%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 94% compared to 67% of the Falken EuroALL Season AS210. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV was done in 2023, compared to 2018 when was the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2024 215/50 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate 2 SUV and the EuroALL Season AS210 were tested.
# | Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium2. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Test winner
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 62 | 66 | 52 | 26 | ||
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 62 | 58 | 44 | 26 | ||
Falken EuroAll Season AS210 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 47 | 49 | 45 | 23 | ||
Show test details |