Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Continental (70%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 94% compared to 85% of the Continental AllSeasonContact 2. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2024 215/50 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate 2 SUV and the AllSeasonContact 2 were tested.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R15 - R50 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Test winner
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 62 | 66 | 52 | 26 | ||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 62 | 58 | 44 | 26 | ||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 51 | 66 | 52 | 24 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||