Segment
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Falken (44%). The first tyre test of Michelin Alpin A4 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Alpin A4 and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested.
# | Michelin Alpin A4
| Falken EuroWinter HS01
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Highly recommended2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Recommended2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 2,7 |
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,5 | 2,7 | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Show test details |