Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Nokian (52%). The first tyre test of Michelin Alpin 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin Alpin 5 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings.
| # | Michelin Alpin 5
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.882. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
