Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from France. Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Kleber (73%). The first tyre test of Michelin Alpin 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Kleber KRISALP HP3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Alpin 5 and the KRISALP HP3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Michelin Alpin 5
| Kleber KRISALP HP3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary2. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,0 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 1,0 | 2,4 |
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 37,1 | 28,4 | |||||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 | 35,9 | 27,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 33,3 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 | 35,7 | 26,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,1 | 3,2 | 2,6 | 3,5 | 1,5 | 2,6 |
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,3 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
