Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Falken (44%). The first tyre test of Michelin Alpin 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Alpin 5 and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Michelin Alpin 5
| Falken EuroWinter HS01
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | ||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
Michelin Alpin 5 | 37,1 | 28,4 | |||||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 36,2 | 28 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,5 | 2,1 | 3,2 | 2,6 | 3,5 | 1,5 | 2,6 |
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,6 | 3,1 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
Show test details |