Segment
1. Michelin Agilis+ Premium2. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Michelin Agilis+ vs. Fulda Conveo Tour 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Fulda (73%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin Agilis+ and Fulda Conveo Tour 2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Agilis+ and the Conveo Tour 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 79% of Michelin Agilis+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (53%) of the Fulda Conveo Tour 2 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Michelin Agilis+
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Agilis+ 70 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Michelin Agilis+ Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 4,9 | 2,9 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 2,2 | |
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
