Segment
1. Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Premium
Comparison: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate vs. Bridgestone Duravis All Season
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Bridgestone (68%). In this particular case, the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate has a better rating of 81% compared to 41% of the Bridgestone Duravis All Season. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/75 R16 test, where both the Agilis CrossClimate and the Duravis All Season were tested.
| # | Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
| Bridgestone Duravis All Season
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Test winner2. Bridgestone Duravis All Season Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Recommended2. Bridgestone Duravis All Season Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | ||||||
| Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Rating: Test winner | vítěz testu | ||||||
| Bridgestone Duravis All Season Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||