Segment
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Bridgestone (75%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin AGILIS ALPIN and Bridgestone Blizzak W810, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak W810 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the AGILIS ALPIN and the Blizzak W810 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN has B wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 has C rating.
# | Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |