Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (38%) than Maxxis (28%). But when it comes to comparing Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker and Kumho WinterCraft WP71, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the WP-05 Arctictrekker and the WinterCraft WP71 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R12 - R18 | R16 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker Lowcost
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker | 34,2 | 24,6 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 31,5 | 24,8 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker Rating: Not recommended | 3 | 2- | 2- | ||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker | 40,1 | - | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 34,8 | 29,2 | |||||
Show test details |