Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Matador (38%). But when it comes to comparing Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van and Bridgestone Blizzak W810, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the MPS530 Sibir Snow Van and the Blizzak W810 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak W810 also have C wet ratings.
# | Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,2 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |